Thread:Shrev64/@comment-1845428-20131112221405/@comment-5876466-20131130155423

Teenbat wrote: Alrighty. I guess a forum would be better, and then we could lock it after it was done... Though there would be an excessively large amount of them after a while. I'll think about some solutions. Maybe locking, then unlocking the same one for a month? Anyway, yeah, nice to speak to you guys again. I may have misunderstood this part of your message then, Teenbat. Because by "two weeks" I meant that the discussion would be open for two weeks, not that a new forum would be started every two weeks (though that could still happen).

Even when given maximum visibility with the wiki-wide highlight, I feel that even 24 hours is too short, especially for this wiki with not much active members. This is why I suggested two weeks.